Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120655›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024

High success rate of first proficiency testing for RET fusions and RET mutations in lung and thyroid cancer samples by various methods.

Udo Siebolts, Roberto Pappesch, Marcus Bauer, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Mareike Ernst, Anja Haak, Nils Hartmann, Katharina Ilm, Stavros Kalbourtzis, Thomas Krause and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Udo Siebolts *Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roberto Pappesch *Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marcus BauerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mareike ErnstInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anja HaakInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Nils HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina IlmQuIP Ltd, Berlin, Germany.
Stavros KalbourtzisUniversity Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas KrauseEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Daniel KazdalInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hubert SchorleInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kirsten UtpatelInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. sabine.merkelbach-bruse@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular testing of RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC), and non-MTC. The lead panel institute and Quality Assurance Initiative in Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH) selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from MTC for RET mutation testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and FFPE tissue from NSCLC and non-MTC for RET gene fusion testing using either in situ hybridisation (ISH) or NGS methods, forming 3 sub-schemes of the EQA scheme. Tissue material underwent an internal validation phase followed by an external testing phase. The internal validation phase served as a cross-validation step conducted by panel institutes. In the external testing phase, the number of participating institutes in the RET point mutation sub-scheme, RET fusion (ISH) sub-scheme, and RET fusion (NGS) sub-scheme was 32, 24, and 38, respectively. The reported success rates for external testing were 96.0%, 89.5%, and 93.5% for the RET point mutation, the ISH RET fusion, and the NGS RET fusion EQA sub-schemes, respectively. These findings confirm the reliability of the NGS method in detecting RET alterations and align with current screening recommendations. Overall, 31 institutes were certified for RET point mutation testing by NGS methods, 22 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by ISH, and 36 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by NGS methods. Results can be employed to inform real-world diagnostic decisions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLung NeoplasmsMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retThyroid NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisGene FusionHumansIn Situ HybridizationLaboratory Proficiency TestingReproducibility of ResultsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanExternal quality assessment schemesMedullary thyroid carcinomasNon-small cell lung cancerRET fusions; RET point mutations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.