Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120606›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Setup errors analysis in iterative kV CBCT: A clinical study of cervical cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Hui Xiao, Qiman Han, Shuhua Wei, Minghao Du, Xiuwen Deng, Nan Zhang, Chunxiao Li, Junjie Wang, Ang Qu, Ping Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6098-4011
Qiman HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Shuhua WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Minghao DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xiuwen DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Nan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Chunxiao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Ang QuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Ping JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

Bethune Charitable Foundation J202305E038Key Specialty program of Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality Z20008National Key Research and Development Program 2023YFC2413905Special Fund of National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program of China (2021)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to analyze setup errors in pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for patients with non-surgical primary cervical cancer, utilizing the onboard iterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT) imaging system on the Varian Halcyon 2.0 ring gantry structure accelerator to enhance radiotherapy precision.

methodWe selected 132 cervical cancer patients who underwent VMAT with daily iCBCT imaging guidance. Before each treatment session, a registration method based on the bony structure was employed to acquire iCBCT images with the corresponding planning CT images. Following verification and adjustment of image registration results along the three axes (but not rotational), setup errors in the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were recorded for each patient. Subsequently, we analyzed 3642 iCBCT image setup errors.

resultsThe mean setup errors for the X, Y, and Z axes were 4.50 ± 3.79 mm, 6.08 ± 6.30 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.23 mm, respectively. Before correction with iCBCT, setup margins based on the Van Herk formula for the X, Y, and Z axes were 6.28, 12.52, and 3.26 mm, respectively. In individuals aged 60 years and older, setup errors in the X and Y axes were significantly larger than those in the younger group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is no significant linear correlation between setup errors and treatment fraction numbers.

conclusionData analysis underscores the importance of precise Y-axis setup for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT. Radiotherapy centers without daily iCBCT should appropriately extend the planning target volume (PTV) along the Y-axis for cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic VMAT. Elderly patients exhibit significantly larger setup errors compared to younger counterparts. In conclusion, iCBCT-guided radiotherapy is recommended for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT to improve setup precision.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Setup ErrorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskParticle AcceleratorsPrognosiscervical canceriterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT)setup errorsvolumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Identifiers

PMID39120606
PMCPMC11466492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.