Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120537›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2024

Calcinosis in dermatomyositis.

Srijana Davuluri, Lorinda Chung, Christian Lood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srijana DavuluriStanford School of Medicine Division of Rheumatology.
Lorinda ChungStanford School of Medicine & Palo Alto VA Healthcare System, Division of Immunology & Rheumatology, Palo Alto, California.
Christian LoodUniversity of Washington, Division of Rheumatology, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo provide the most recent literature on our understanding behind the pathogenesis and the treatment of calcinosis in dermatomyositis. RECENT

findingsEarly diagnosis and controlling the overall disease activity are cornerstones to prevent calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Observational cohort studies showed that prolonged state of inflammation and features of vascular dysfunction like digital ulcers and abnormal nailfold capillaries are associated with calcinosis. Neutrophil activation and mitochondrial dysfunction have recently emerged as potential mechanistic pathways involved in calcinosis pathogenesis. Few recent case series have alluded to the efficacy of topical and intralesional sodium thiosulfate, while JAK inhibitors appear to be newer promising therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis. SUMMARY: Calcinosis in dermatomyositis consists of deposition of insoluble calcium compounds in the skin and other tissues. It is prevalent in up to 75% of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis and up to 20% in adult dermatomyositis. While it leads to significant patient morbidity, we do not yet understand the pathogenesis in its entirety. Surgical excision although palliative is the mainstay of treatment and should be offered to patients. All available treatment options are only based on very low level of evidence.

Indexed as

CalcinosisDermatomyositisHumansThiosulfatessodium thiosulfateThiosulfates

Identifiers

PMID39120537
PMCPMC11451928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.