Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39120250›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Practices: A Narrative Review Elucidating the Impact on Healthcare Systems, Mechanisms and Paediatric Applications.

Patricia Anaid Romero-García, Sergio Ramirez-Perez, Jorge Javier Miguel-González, Sandra Guzmán-Silahua, Javier Adan Castañeda-Moreno, Sophia Komninou, Simón Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-Lara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Anaid Romero-GarcíaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-5595-2939
Sergio Ramirez-PerezSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-8695
Jorge Javier Miguel-GonzálezSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6823-2420
Sandra Guzmán-SilahuaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-2994
Javier Adan Castañeda-MorenoSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0005-8866-1309
Sophia KomninouFaculty of Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-8302
Simón Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-LaraSchool of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-2481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for the general population is expanding, there remains a scarcity of studies investigating the efficacy and utilisation of CAM practices, specifically in the paediatric population. In accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of the parental utilisation of CAM in their dependents is estimated to reach up to 80%. This literature review identified broad, heterogeneous, and inconclusive evidence regarding CAM's applications and effectiveness, primarily attributed to variance in sociodemographic factors and differences in national healthcare systems. Additionally, the review identified a lack of consensus and polarised positions among mainstream professionals regarding the mechanisms of action, applications, and effectiveness of CAM. This narrative review presents varied results concerning the efficacy of most CAM therapies and their applications; however, some evidence suggests potential benefits for acupuncture, yoga, tai chi, and massage in improving physical and mental health. Moreover, the available evidence indicates that meditation may enhance mental health, while reiki may only influence patients' perceptions of comfort. In light of the intricate and multifaceted nature of herbal medicine, it is imperative to assess its efficacy on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific compounds and procedures involved. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for health professionals, offering guidance for personalised healthcare approaches that consider the values and beliefs of patients, thereby facilitating integrated, evidence-based practices aimed at enhancing the quality of healthcare services and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

complementary and alternative medicinemental healthnutritionalpaediatric healthphysicalphysiologicalpsychologicaltraditional medicinewell-being

Identifiers

PMID39120250
PMCPMC11311728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.