Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119981›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of orthodontics2024

The effect of early childhood non-nutritive sucking behavior including pacifiers on malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Irma Arpalahti, Krista Hänninen, Mimmi Tolvanen, Juha Varrela, David P Rice

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01854502 (Organizing Family-based Health Promotion for Young Children in Public Dental Service), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01854502 nacompletednot on this map

Organizing Family-based Health Promotion for Young Children in Public Dental Service

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TurkuRan2008 to 2011Enrolled804ConditionsDental Plaque, Dental Caries, Behaviorial HabitsArmsOral hygiene and fluoride use, Diet and use of xylitol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irma ArpalahtiUniversity of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.
Krista HänninenOrthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 1, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Mimmi TolvanenUniversity of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.
Juha VarrelaUniversity of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.
David P RiceOrthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 1, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9301-3078

Funding

DentoBonThe Regional State Administrative Agency of Southern Finland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/rationaleSystematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs. TRIAL

designSingle region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

objectivesTo investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.

participantsThe subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.

interventionOne-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education. OUTCOMES: Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding. RANDOMIZATION

methodThree districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots. BLINDING: It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.

resultsFrom the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers. HARMS: No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.

conclusionThe use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.

Indexed as

FingersuckingMalocclusionPacifiersSucking BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFinlandHumansInfantMaleOpen BiteProspective StudiesTime Factorsdigit suckingmalocclusionnon-nutritive sucking habitpacifier sucking

Identifiers

PMID39119981
PMCPMC11310778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.