Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119927›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

A multicenter study on deep learning for glioblastoma auto-segmentation with prior knowledge in multimodal imaging.

Suqing Tian, Yinglong Liu, Xinhui Mao, Xin Xu, Shumeng He, Lecheng Jia, Wei Zhang, Peng Peng, Junjie Wang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Suqing TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yinglong LiuUnited Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical Equipment, Shenzhen, China.
Xinhui MaoRadiotherapy Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Xin XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, China.
Shumeng HeIntelligent Radiation Treatment Laboratory, United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, China.
Lecheng JiaUnited Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical Equipment, Shenzhen, China.
Wei ZhangRadiotherapy Business Unit, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Peng PengUnited Imaging Research Institute of Innovative Medical Equipment, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-6117
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Innovation Project Funding of Peking University Third Hospital H77473-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A precise radiotherapy plan is crucial to ensure accurate segmentation of glioblastomas (GBMs) for radiation therapy. However, the traditional manual segmentation process is labor-intensive and heavily reliant on the experience of radiation oncologists. In this retrospective study, a novel auto-segmentation method is proposed to address these problems. To assess the method's applicability across diverse scenarios, we conducted its development and evaluation using a cohort of 148 eligible patients drawn from four multicenter datasets and retrospective data collection including noncontrast CT, multisequence MRI scans, and corresponding medical records. All patients were diagnosed with histologically confirmed high-grade glioma (HGG). A deep learning-based method (PKMI-Net) for automatically segmenting gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volumes (CTV1 and CTV2) of GBMs was proposed by leveraging prior knowledge from multimodal imaging. The proposed PKMI-Net demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting, respectively, GTV, CTV1, and CTV2 in an 11-patient test set, achieving Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.94, 0.95, and 0.92; 95% Hausdorff distances (HD95) of 2.07, 1.18, and 3.95 mm; average surface distances (ASD) of 0.69, 0.39, and 1.17 mm; and relative volume differences (RVD) of 5.50%, 9.68%, and 3.97%. Moreover, the vast majority of GTV, CTV1, and CTV2 produced by PKMI-Net are clinically acceptable and require no revision for clinical practice. In our multicenter evaluation, the PKMI-Net exhibited consistent and robust generalizability across the various datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in automatically segmenting GBMs. The proposed method using prior knowledge in multimodal imaging can improve the contouring accuracy of GBMs, which holds the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of GBMs' radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor Burdenclinical evaluationdeep learningglioblastoma auto‐segmentationmulticenter studyprior knowledge

Identifiers

PMID39119927
PMCPMC11447882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.