ArticleJBI evidence implementation2025
Developing the Knowledge Translation and Impact Planner (KTIPs): a resource to enhance research translation and impact in health and rehabilitation.
Article in JBI evidence implementation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge translation (KT) is an essential skill to assist health academics to better develop, disseminate, and implement research findings to improve health care quality and impact, but many academics lack knowledge and skills in this area.
objectivesThis study aimed to describe the KT-informed approach used to develop the Knowledge Translation and Impact Planner (KTIPs) to improve the quality of KT planning, and to examine the acceptability of the KTIPs.
methodsThe process of developing the tool is described, including use of published literature, application of integrated KT, and consultation with end-users (n=18), including university academics, higher degree research (HDR) candidates, and experts in the KT field. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework was used to categorize strategies used during pilot implementation. The tool includes a comprehensive instructional guide and accompanying template that systematically takes researchers through each step of the KT process: synthesis, exchange, dissemination, and implementation, as well as guidance on planning for impact following effective KT.
resultsAcademic staff and HDR candidate stakeholders, and comprehensive advice from experts shaped development of the tool. The tool went through three rounds of concurrent feedback with different end-users. End-users confirmed its acceptability, indicating the KTIPs was adaptable, comprehensive, instructional, and facilitated development of KT and impact plans addressing varied KT goals.
conclusionThe KTIPs was acceptable among academic staff and HDR candidates and facilitated the KT and impact planning process. The KTIPs is freely available and is designed to be navigated, completed, and saved electronically to facilitate implementation of developed plans. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A253.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.