ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Segmentation of stroke lesions using transformers-augmented MRI analysis.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Quantum SVM-driven framework for accurate brain stroke classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Deep learning segmentation with uncertainty quantification for spinal tuberculosis on fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Neurology: Applications, Challenges, and a Review of AI Tools for Stroke Imaging, Clinical Decision Making, and Outcome Prediction Models.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Trans RCED-UNet3+: a hybrid CNN-transformer model for precise lung nodule segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Segmentation of stroke lesions using transformers-augmented MRI analysis.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of chronic stroke lesions from mono-spectral magnetic resonance imaging scans (e.g., T1-weighted images) is a difficult task due to the arbitrary shape, complex texture, variable size and intensities, and varied locations of the lesions. Due to this inherent spatial heterogeneity, existing machine learning methods have shown moderate performance for chronic lesion delineation. In this study, we introduced: (1) a method that integrates transformers' deformable feature attention mechanism with convolutional deep learning architecture to improve the accuracy and generalizability of stroke lesion segmentation, and (2) an ecological data augmentation technique based on inserting real lesions into intact brain regions. Our combination of these two approaches resulted in a significant increase in segmentation performance, with a Dice index of 0.82 (±0.39), outperforming the existing methods trained and tested on the same Anatomical Tracings of Lesions After Stroke (ATLAS) 2022 dataset. Our method performed relatively well even for cases with small stroke lesions. We validated the robustness of our method through an ablation study and by testing it on new unseen brain scans from the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) 2015 dataset. Overall, our proposed approach of transformers with ecological data augmentation offers a robust way to delineate chronic stroke lesions with clinically relevant accuracy. Our method can be extended to other challenging tasks that require automated detection and segmentation of diverse brain abnormalities from clinical scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.