Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119828›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Toward Diverse Plant Proteins for Food Innovation.

Woojeong Kim, Canice Chun-Yin Yiu, Yong Wang, Weibiao Zhou, Cordelia Selomulya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Double Network as a Design Paradigm for Structuring Emulsion Gels in Food.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Toward Diverse Plant Proteins for Food Innovation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Woojeong KimSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8785-3422
Canice Chun-Yin YiuSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Yong WangSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Weibiao ZhouDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117542, Singapore.
Cordelia SelomulyaSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-0308

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200100642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review highlights the development of plant proteins from a wide variety of sources, as most of the research and development efforts to date have been limited to a few sources including soy, chickpea, wheat, and pea. The native structure of plant proteins during production and their impact on food colloids including emulsions, foams, and gels are considered in relation to their fundamental properties, while highlighting the recent developments in the production and processing technologies with regard to their impacts on the molecular properties and aggregation of the proteins. The ability to quantify structural, morphological, and rheological properties can provide a better understanding of the roles of plant proteins in food systems. The applications of plant proteins as dairy and meat alternatives are discussed from the perspective of food structure formation. Future directions on the processing of plant proteins and potential applications are outlined to encourage the generation of more diverse plant-based products.

Indexed as

Plant ProteinsFood HandlingPlant Proteinsfood applicationfunctional propertiesplant proteinprotein interactionprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID39119828
PMCPMC11892504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.