Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119619›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2024

Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.

Meera Rao, Sebastian Densley, Adeife Marciniak, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Goodness Okwaraji, Diana Lobaina, Vama Jhumkhawala, Michelle Knecht, Panagiota Kitsantas and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meera RaoSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Sebastian DensleySchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Adeife MarciniakSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Sara BurgoaSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Yasmine ZerroukiSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Goodness OkwarajiSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Diana LobainaSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-7650
Vama JhumkhawalaSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Michelle KnechtSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Panagiota KitsantasSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Lea SaccaSchmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissemination and implementation science (D&I) can help bridge the gap between research and practice by addressing how to facilitate and maintain pre-existing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in various contexts within different fields, including that of breast cancer screening and treatment. Yet, despite the availability of D&I frameworks and strategies, there is a lack of studies exploring knowledge transfer dissemination and implementation models, strategies, and frameworks in the setting of breast cancer care. There is a need for studies that create guidelines and roadmaps built on theoretical foundations of D&I research to scale up successful D&I of strategies, frameworks, and protocols proven to cater to the needs of all breast cancer patients when seeking screening and treatment services. The Arksey and O'Malley (2005) York methodology was used as guidance for this review: (1) identifying research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies relevant to the research questions; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting results. Most cited barriers (

Indexed as

Breast cancercancer preventiondissemination strategiesframeworksimplementation sciencewomen

Identifiers

PMID39119619
PMCPMC11304495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.