ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Case report: A pregnant woman accidental treated with spironolactone in mid-gestation.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Challenge of Potassium-Wasting and Hypertension in Pregnancy: Lessons from a Geller Syndrome Workup.Case reports in nephrology and dialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic, is used to treat hypertension, heart failure, and certain hyperandrogenic disorders. Its use during pregnancy is not recommended due to the risk of feminizing male fetuses, primarily because of its antiandrogenic activity. However, human data remain scarce and largely inconclusive. Here, we present the first case of a 25-year-old pregnant woman, at 16 weeks of gestation, who was inadvertently exposed to spironolactone (240 mg/day) for 1 week due to a pharmacy dispensing error. The patient subsequently delivered a healthy male infant with normal genitalia at 38 weeks of gestation following vaginal delivery. Current follow-up shows that the infant is healthy and developing normally. This article summarizes the potential causes of spironolactone-induced anomalous genital development and explores the safety of new-generation mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) during pregnancy. The mechanisms behind spironolactone-induced anomalous genital development in male fetuses have not been fully elucidated. Spironolactone competes with dihydrotestosterone for binding to androgen receptors and inhibits enzymes involved in androgen biosynthesis, which may partly explain its antiandrogenic effects. Recent advancements in MRAs have led to the development of compounds with higher selectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, thereby reducing the incidence of antiandrogen side effects. These new-generation MRAs may be effective alternatives during pregnancy, but more data are needed to establish their safety in pregnant women. This case contributes to the limited but growing body of literature on the safety profile of spironolactone in pregnancy, providing insights into its effects during a critical period of fetal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.