ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Causal relationship between body mass index and anal fistula: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbiota in patients with cefuroxime resistance and anal fistula revealed by 16S ribosomal DNA.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Significant evidence has been documented regarding the intricate connection between the development of anal fistula (AF) and the composition of Body Mass Index (BMI). Nevertheless, due to the inherent limitations of reverse causality and confounders inherent in observational studies, this relationship remains unclarified. Our study aims to reveal the causal impact between BMI and AF, as well as identify its associated risk factors, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of this complex interaction. Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified through genome-wide association study (GWAS) databases were used as instrumental variables for analysis. BMI served as the exposure variable, with six pooled GWAS datasets included. AF was the outcome variable. The Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analytical technique, with MR-Egger regression, Weighted Median (WME) estimation, and Multiplicity Residual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) tests serving as secondary validations of the IVW results. Odds ratios (OR) were utilized as indicators to evaluate the causal relationship between BMI and AF. Results: A total of 738 SNPs strongly associated with the exposure were identified as instrumental variables. The IVW results demonstrated a positive correlation between BMI and the risk of AF. The MR-Egger analysis yielded Conclusion: High BMI is positively associated with the risk of AF, and correcting BMI levels may have a preventive effect on the incidence of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.