ArticleBioelectricity2024
Changes in Mitochondrial Membrane Potential in
Article in Bioelectricity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-thermal venous endothelial injury by microsecond irreversible electroporation: mechanisms of apoptosis, oxidative stress, and vascular closure initiation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Increases the Susceptibility of Human A549 Cells to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Effects of ultra-fast nanosecond electric pulses on mitochondria transmembrane potential and oxidation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the introduction of nanosecond (ns) pulses, it was suggested that such pulses could be used to permeabilize intracellular membranes, including the mitochondrial membrane. The results presented thus far, however, are not conclusive. Interestingly, the effect of longer microsecond (μs) pulses on changes in mitochondria has never been investigated. We, therefore, investigated the changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability through changes in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in CHO and H9c2 cells after electroporation with 4 ns, 200 ns, and 100 μs pulses. In the range of reversible electroporation, the decrease in MMP generally depended on the cell line. In CHO, ns pulses decreased MMP at lower electroporation intensities than μs. In H9c2, ns and μs were equally effective. In the range of irreversible electroporation, MMP decreased even further, regardless of pulse duration and cell type. The analysis at different time points showed that the changes in MMP within the first hour after pulse treatment are dynamic. Our results on the efficacy of ns pulses are consistent with published data, but with this study we show that μs pulses cause similar changes in MMP as ns pulses, demonstrating that electroporation affects MMP regardless of pulse duration. At the same time, however, differences in MMP changes were observed between different cell lines, indicating some dependence of MMP changes on cell type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.