ArticleBioelectricity2024
Nano-Pulse Stimulation Treatment Inhibits Pan02 Murine Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Induces a Long-Term Adaptive Immune Response with Abscopal Effects When Combined with Immune-Enhancing Agents.
Article in Bioelectricity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanosecond Electric Pulses as a Novel In Situ Vaccination Strategy for Cancer Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges and Prospects.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Nano-Pulse Stimulation Therapy in Oncology.Bioelectricity · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and immunotherapy alone has not demonstrated sufficient efficacy in the treatment of nonresectable tumors. Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ therapy (NPS™) applies nanosecond electric pulses that lead to regulated cell death, exposing tumor antigen to the immune system. To establish a primary Pan02 tumor, mice were intradermally injected with Pan02 cells into the right flank. Secondary, rechallenge tumors and distal, secondary tumors (abscopal response) were established by injecting Pan02 cells into the opposite left flank. After 5 days of tumor growth, one of the tumors was treated with NPS, followed by injection with an immune-enhancing agent to stimulate an immune response. Growth of the treated primary tumor and untreated rechallenge tumors (injected 60-days post-treatment) or distal secondary tumors (injected simultaneously with the primary) was monitored. NPS in combination with the adjuvant and TLR agonist, resiquimod (RES), was the optimal treatment regimen for both eliminating a primary Pan02 tumor as well as inhibiting growth of a Pan02 cell rechallenge tumor. This inhibition of the rechallenge tumor injected 2 months after eliminating the primary tumor suggests a long-term immune response had been stimulated. Additional support for this came from the observations that depleting CD8+ T-cells reduced inhibition of rechallenge tumor growth by 35% and rechallenge tumors had 3-fold more CD8+ T-cells than tumors injected after surgical resection of the primary tumor. When the NPS-treated tumor was immediately injected with the anti-OX40 antibody to agonize the function of the costimulatory T cell receptor, OX40, up to 80% of untreated abscopal tumors were eliminated. NPS plus RES was the most effective at both eliminating a primary tumor and inhibiting a rechallenge tumor. NPS treatment followed by injection of aOX40 was the most effective at inhibiting the growth of an untreated abscopal tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.