ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2024
Co-occurrence of
Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor on "The diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2 in a patient with calpainopathy requires the determination of CCTG expansion" [].Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2025Article
- The diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2 in a patient with calpainopathy requires the determination of CCTG expansion.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Muscular dystrophy is a group of heterogeneous diseases causing progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Many types have been defined, including Duchenne/Becker, myotonic, limb-girdle, congenital, and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophies. This study aims to present the first patient with both a homozygous Case description: Homozygous pathogenic variant c.550delA (p.Thr184ArgfsTer36) in the Comment: In general, the co-occurrence of two diseases in a single patient is considered as uncommon, although possible, and therefore it should be taken into consideration in the populations with a relatively high prevalence of myotonic dystrophy type 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.