ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Integrating multi-modal remote sensing, deep learning, and attention mechanisms for yield prediction in plant breeding experiments.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Explainable CNN framework for accurate crop disease detection using plant leaf images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-destructive monitoring of root biomass in hydroponically grown leafy vegetables: comparison between machine learning-based RGB and hyperspectral imaging.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Multi-sensor phenotyping of yield and yield stability for genotype selection in durum wheat.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Transformer model to determine spatio-temporal relationships of variables, and interpretability for soybean seed yield, oil, and protein prediction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Rice seedling age detection under field conditions using M-Lresnet50 with image and environmental data.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Modeling grain biochemical composition traits of commercial sorghum hybrids under diverse management practices.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- AI driven multi modal deep learning system for wheat disease detection, yield prediction, and crop health monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- WPDSI: A deep learning method for wheat phenology detection from single-temporal images.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Fusion of Optical, Radar, and LiDAR Data for Advancing Land Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Federated learning for crop yield prediction: A comprehensive review of techniques and applications.MethodsX · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In both plant breeding and crop management, interpretability plays a crucial role in instilling trust in AI-driven approaches and enabling the provision of actionable insights. The primary objective of this research is to explore and evaluate the potential contributions of deep learning network architectures that employ stacked LSTM for end-of-season maize grain yield prediction. A secondary aim is to expand the capabilities of these networks by adapting them to better accommodate and leverage the multi-modality properties of remote sensing data. In this study, a multi-modal deep learning architecture that assimilates inputs from heterogeneous data streams, including high-resolution hyperspectral imagery, LiDAR point clouds, and environmental data, is proposed to forecast maize crop yields. The architecture includes attention mechanisms that assign varying levels of importance to different modalities and temporal features that, reflect the dynamics of plant growth and environmental interactions. The interpretability of the attention weights is investigated in multi-modal networks that seek to both improve predictions and attribute crop yield outcomes to genetic and environmental variables. This approach also contributes to increased interpretability of the model's predictions. The temporal attention weight distributions highlighted relevant factors and critical growth stages that contribute to the predictions. The results of this study affirm that the attention weights are consistent with recognized biological growth stages, thereby substantiating the network's capability to learn biologically interpretable features. Accuracies of the model's predictions of yield ranged from 0.82-0.93
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.