ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Current and Future Medical Staff Knowledge on the Course of Trauma Patient Management.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive meta-analysis of emergency trauma outcomes: trends, interventions, and survival rates.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- A mobile-based educational tool for training medical students in emergency trauma management: development and pilot study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of the International Trauma Life Support (ITLS) Course on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionManagement of injuries, especially in life-threatening situations, is critical to morbidity and mortality for trauma patients. The qualifications of medical staff and students in medicine, emergency medical services, and nursing help to ensure consistent, high-quality care for patients. The study aimed to assess the knowledge of our staff and learners in the management of trauma patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was carried out using a proprietary research tool consisting of 47 questions, including six independent variables. The knowledge assessment tool has been divided into five categories according to the degree of difficulty. The questions have been created based on the current guidelines of the ERC 2021, ITLS, PTLS, and TCCC.
resultsThe study included 295 subjects (medical students, nursing students, students of emergency medical services, physicians, paramedics, and nurses). The vast majority of respondents (79.7%) have never participated in a certified trauma course. Respondents could obtain a total of 117 points for answering all questions. The highest score was 111 points, and the lowest was 26 points. The average score was 63 points. Paramedics received the highest average score of 78 points. The question with the smallest number of correct answers concerned the priority procedure in the case of an electric shock victim.
conclusionBetter training in trauma patient management is needed for both current medical staff and students. A certified trauma course is a good source of knowledge and skills, but it would need to be repeated periodically. This would ensure an increase in the competence of medical staff involved in the care of trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.