ArticleCureus2024
Intriguing Insights From 100 Consecutive Colorectal Cancer Cases in Mid-Kerala: Sparse BRAF Gene Mutations and Mismatch Repair Deficiency (MMR-D).
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent types of cancer globally. It is well established that the development of CRC primarily results from the sequential activation of oncogenes and the simultaneous inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. It has also been noted that after the initial oncogenic mutation, many subpopulations with different mutational profiles are created, causing heterogeneity among the tumors. This retrospective study analyzed 100 patients diagnosed with CRC through colectomy over an eighteen-month period at a tertiary referral center in mid-Kerala, India. Pathology records and histological slides were reviewed by two pathologists, and clinicopathological data were collected from pathology reports. Immunohistochemical analysis for BRAF mutation and possible microsatellite instability (MSI) (by mismatch repair (MMR) protein study) was conducted on tumor tissue blocks sent to an external center due to the lack of an automated platform at the hospital. The study utilized Roche's Benchmark XT platform for BRAF analysis and assessed MMR protein expression using antibodies for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. The mean age of patients was 58.36 years, with a male predominance (58.0%). Most tumors were classified as T3 (71.0%, n-71) and T2/T4a (14.0% each, n-14), while nodal involvement included N0 (35.0%, n-35), N1 (26.0%, n-26), N2 (19.0%, n-19), and NX (20.0%, n-20). Histological examination revealed predominantly well-differentiated tumors (78.0%, n-78), with lymphatic invasion noted in 41.0% (n-41) and vascular invasion in 5.0% (n-5) of cases. Left-sided tumors predominated (33.0%, n-33), followed by rectal carcinoma (37.0%, n-37), and right-sided colon cancers (30.0%, n-30). Genetic profiling showed sparse BRAF mutations (1.0%, n-1) and MSI (1.0%, n-1), with some cases exhibiting loss of MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The study highlights the rarity of BRAF mutations in this cohort and emphasizes the diverse pathological and molecular characteristics observed. The discussion focuses on the implications of these findings, suggesting that CRC in this population exhibits unique clinicopathological features potentially influenced by factors beyond genetic mutations. Further multicentric studies are warranted to comprehensively explore these factors and refine risk stratification and treatment strategies for CRC patients in similar demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.