Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119379›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Pin-Retained Amalgam: An Intricate Restorative Case Study.

Harshita Dhanrajani, Kajol Relan, Manoj Chandak, Priyanka Paul, Gaurav Hemnani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harshita DhanrajaniDentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Kajol RelanConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Manoj ChandakConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Priyanka PaulPublic Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Gaurav HemnaniDentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amalgam has made dental restorations more manageable, especially in difficult cases, due to its strength, durability, and relatively low cost. There can be pros and cons of each dental material depending on which class of cases it is applied or not applied for, depending on the patient's need, and, of course, the dentist's choice. These materials are used frequently for their hardness and durability and are ideal for extensive restoration procedures. On the other hand, composite resins are considered to be more aesthetic for the profitable areas where esthetics are more important. In contrast, glass ionomer cement is considered to be ideal for low-stress-bearing areas. The following case report of pin-retained amalgam restoration presents an example of its application in practical situations and the factors that must be considered to justify the use of this material against others. This paper explains various factors in considering pin-retained amalgam restorations and the procedure for a better and positive outcome.

Indexed as

amalgamindirect retentionpin-retained amalgampinsrestoration

Identifiers

PMID39119379
PMCPMC11309740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.