ArticleHippokratia
Categorization and comparison of patients suffering from migraines without aura or other headaches in primary health care centers in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a cross-sectional, multi-centered, prospective study.
Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although migraine is among the most common disabling conditions worldwide, it is rarely accurately diagnosed. This study aimed to categorize and compare patients suffering from migraines without aura (MWA) or other types of headaches in primary health care facilities. Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, epidemiological, and non-interventional study at 46 primary health care facilities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The validated Balkan Migraine Screening Questionnaire (BMSQ) was used to classify patients into MWA or non-MWA groups. Results: The study comprised 1,366 patients categorized into MWA (n =896, 65.6 %) and non-MWA (n =470, 34.4 %) groups. Seven hundred thirty-four patients with MWA were newly identified. The patients in the MWA group were significantly younger, at 49.9 ± 13.7 years, compared to the non-MWA group at 52.0 ± 14.4 years (p =0.008). The MWA group documented less alcohol consumption (11.0 % vs 18.7 % for the non-MWA group, p <0.001) and experienced more severe headaches [headache intensity on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with a median score of 7, interquartile range (IQR): 6-8 vs 5 (IQR: 4-7) for the non-MWA group, p <0.001)]. The MWA group had a higher proportion of women (80.1 % vs 64.3 % for the non-MWA group, p <0.001). Compared to the non-MWA group, patients in the MWA group experienced more frequent headache attacks (more than six attacks in the preceding six months: 50.6 % vs 28.1 %, p <0.001), needed additional headache treatment (using two or more classes of antiheadache therapy 41.3 % vs 26.4 %, p <0.001), and had a positive family history of migraine (46.9 % vs 23.0 %, p <0.001). The binomial regression model identified two positive predictors (family history of migraines and headache intensity) and one negative predictor (alcohol consumption) for the BMSQ classification of patients into the MWA group. Conclusion: More than half the patients in this study were newly classified as having MWA, indicating a high prevalence of undiagnosed migraine. Categorization of patients with headaches is of crucial importance for appropriate treatment and should be utilized in everyday practice in primary health care settings. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (2):99-105.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39119362PMC11305155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.