ArticleOncology letters2024
Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should not be defined as regional lymph node metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cervical lymph node metastases in thoracic esophageal cancer: a systematic review.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Analysis of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Esophageal Cancer with Baseline Supraclavicular Lymph Node Involvement.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment strategies of esophageal cancer with concurrent cervical node metastasis: a Dutch nationwide population-based cohort study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been determined. The aim of the present study was to provide a detailed definition of the range of SCLN regions and to explore whether SCLNs should be considered as a regional lymph nodes for patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC. A retrospective analysis was performed on 230 patients with locally advanced cervical or upper thoracic ESCC who underwent radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The range of SCLN regions was defined in detail on contrast enhanced computed tomography images of the neck. According to whether the patient had lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular region, the included patients were divided into two groups, and the survival differences and reasons for treatment failure between the two groups were analyzed. Of the 230 patients with ESCC, 71 (30.87%) exhibited lymph node metastases in the supraclavicular region. The median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 30 months, respectively (P<0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 28 months, respectively (P<0.001). During the follow-up period, there were a total of 101 cases of failure of treatment in the irradiation field, 6 cases had esophageal metastasis in the non-irradiated field and 27 cases had regional lymph node metastasis in the non-irradiated field. In addition, there were 33 cases of metastasis to the distant lymph nodes or organs. There was no significant difference in the local treatment failure rate between the groups with or without SCLN metastasis in both the irradiation field and the non-irradiation field, but the probability of distant metastasis in the SCLN metastasis group was significantly higher than that in the group without SCLN metastasis (P=0.025). In conclusion, patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC with SCLN metastasis have a poor prognosis and the median overall survival time is closer to that of metastatic ESCC than ESCC with regional lymph node metastasis; therefore, SCLNs should not be defined as regional lymph nodes in patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.