Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119227›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2024

Efficacy of timing‑dependent infusion of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Toshimitsu Tanaka, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Shotaro Yamaguchi, Yasutaka Shimotsuura, Sachiko Nagasu, Kenta Murotani, Fumihiko Fujita, Takumi Kawaguchi, Keisuke Miwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Circadian rhythms and lung cancer biology and immunotherapy: Emerging opportunities and challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Optimizing Nivolumab Efficacy: The Role of Dosing Time in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toshimitsu TanakaMultidisciplinary Treatment Cancer Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Shotaro YamaguchiMultidisciplinary Treatment Cancer Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Yasutaka ShimotsuuraMultidisciplinary Treatment Cancer Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Sachiko NagasuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Kurume University, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Fumihiko FujitaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Takumi KawaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Keisuke MiwaMultidisciplinary Treatment Cancer Center, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although an association exists between the timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration and therapeutic efficacy in several types of cancer, to the best of our knowledge, no reports exist regarding this relationship in gastric cancer (GC). The present study aimed to evaluate the optimal timing of ICI (nivolumab) administration in patients with advanced GC. A total of 58 consecutive patients with advanced GC who received nivolumab monotherapy after ≥2 chemotherapy regimens were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the median time of nivolumab administration: i) Early-timing and (ii) late-timing groups, and the efficacy was assessed in both groups. The early-timing group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the late-timing group [median OS 8.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-12.9 vs. median OS 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.6-6.1]. Moreover, patients in the early-timing group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those in the late-timing group (median PFS 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9 months vs. median PFS 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.9-2.1 months). Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that early timing, immune-related adverse events and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration were associated with longer OS and PFS. Cutoff Finder analysis revealed that the optimal timing of nivolumab administration for achieving better outcomes was before 12:06 p.m. Nivolumab administration in the morning, especially before 12:06 p.m., had a better clinical impact on patients with advanced GC.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmGCimmunotherapynivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39119227
PMCPMC11307583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.