Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119096›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Priority setting and migration health policies for European countries.

Bernadette N Kumar, Anand Bhopal, Karl Blanchet, Kolitha Wickramage, Kristine Husøy Onarheim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bernadette N KumarDivision of Health Services Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Anand BhopalBergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Kolitha WickramageHead, Global Migration Health Research & Epidemiology Unit, Migration Health Division, Global Data Institute (GDI), Berlin, Germany.
Kristine Husøy OnarheimBergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda has committed to 'ensuring that no one is left behind'. Applying the right to health of non-citizens and international migrants is challenging in today's highly polarized political discourse on migration governance and integration. We explore the role of a priority setting approach to help support better, fairer and more transparent policy making in migration health. A priority setting approach must also incorporate migration health for more efficient and fair allocation of scarce resources. Explicitly recognizing the trade-offs as part of strategic planning, would circumvent ad hoc decision-making during crises, not well-suited for fairness. Discussions surrounding decisions about expanding services to migrants or subgroups of migrants, which services and to whom should be transparent and fair. We conclude that a priority setting approach can help better inform policy making by being more closely aligned with the practical challenges policy makers face towards the progressive realization of migration health.

Indexed as

FairnessHealth policyMigration and healthPriority setting

Identifiers

PMID39119096
PMCPMC11306211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.