Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119093›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Performance of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors: a systematic review.

Yilin Rao, Yuxi Ma, Jinghan Wang, Weiwei Xiao, Jiaqi Wu, Liang Shi, Ling Guo, Liyuan Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors on Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yilin Rao *Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yuxi Ma *Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jinghan WangDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Weiwei XiaoDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jiaqi WuDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Liang ShiDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Ling GuoDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Liyuan FanDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic precision of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors, considering the increasing utilization of radiomics in tumor diagnosis. Although some researchers have attempted to apply radiomics in this context, there is ongoing debate regarding its accuracy. Methods: Databases of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to May 29, 2024 were systematically searched. The quality of included primary studies was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) checklist. The meta-analysis was performed utilizing a bivariate mixed-effects model. Results: A total of 39 primary studies were incorporated. The machine learning model relying on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.86], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.27-0.99] in the validation set. The machine learning model based on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83[95% CI: 0.76, 0.88], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.17-1.00] in the validation set. The models also demonstrated high predictive accuracy for benign lesions. Conclusion: There is great potential for radiomics-based models to improve the accuracy of diagnosing benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland. To further enhance this potential, future studies should consider implementing standardized radiomics-based features, adopting more robust feature selection methods, and utilizing advanced model development tools. These measures can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023434931.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learningmeta-analysisparotid tumorsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39119093
PMCPMC11306159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.