Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39119053›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2024

Effect of Cultural Adaptation of a Smartphone-Based Self-Help Programme on Its Acceptability and Efficacy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Eva Heim, Sebastian Burchert, Mirëlinda Shala, Anna Hoxha, Marco Kaufmann, Arlinda Cerga Pashoja, Naser Morina, Michael P Schaub, Christine Knaevelsrud, Andreas Maercker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Why Did Our Trial Not Work Out? A Qualitative Analysis.Clinical psychology in Europe · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cultural adaptation ofInternet interventions · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva HeimInstitute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-7451
Sebastian BurchertDepartment of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-5485
Mirëlinda ShalaDepartment of Economics, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-467X
Anna HoxhaDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marco KaufmannEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-7734
Arlinda Cerga PashojaFaculty of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7029-947X
Naser MorinaDepartment of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-4408
Michael P SchaubSwiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8375-4005
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1342-7006
Andreas MaerckerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-3266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research on cultural adaptation of psychological interventions indicates that a higher level of adaptation is associated with a higher effect size of the intervention. However, direct comparisons of different levels of adaptations are scarce. Aims: This study used a smartphone-based self-help programme called Step-by-Step (Albanian: Hap-pas-Hapi) for the treatment of psychological distress among Albanian-speaking immigrants in Switzerland and Germany. Two levels of cultural adaptation (i.e., surface vs. deep structure adaptation) were compared. We hypothesised that the deep structure adaptation would enhance the acceptance and efficacy of the intervention. Method: We conducted a two-arm, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were good command of the Albanian language, age above 18, and elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score above 15). Primary outcome measures were the total score of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the number of participants who completed at least three (out of five) sessions. Secondary outcomes were global functioning, well-being, post-traumatic stress, and self-defined problems. Results: Two-hundred-twenty-two participants were included, of which 18 (8%) completed the post-assessments. The number of participants who completed the third session was equal in both conditions, with N = 5 (5%) and N = 6 (6%) respectively. Discussion: Drop-out rates were high in both conditions, and no group difference was found regarding the acceptance of the intervention. The high drop-out rate stands in contrast with other trials testing Step-by-Step. Future research should examine cultural factors impacting recruitment strategies, as insights could help to reduce participant drop-out rates in clinical trials.

Indexed as

cultural adaptationcultural concepts of distressfatalismimmigrantsmobile mental healthonline interventionspsychological interventionsself-helpworking alliance

Identifiers

PMID39119053
PMCPMC11303917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.