Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118997›Full record

ArticleEurope's journal of psychology2024

An Ecological Approach to Conceptual Thinking in Material Engagement.

Nicolás Alessandroni, Lambros Malafouris, Shaun Gallagher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europe's journal of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pathways to Agency: Cross-Cultural Evidence From Indigenous Wichi and Eurodescendant Caregiver-Infant Interactions.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolás AlessandroniConcordia Infant Research Laboratory, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-0969
Lambros MalafourisHertford College/Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-4998
Shaun GallagherDepartment of Philosophy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3147-9929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although post-cognitivist approaches have shaken the status quo by emphasising the dynamic interactions among the brain, the body, and the environment in cognition, mainstream psychological theories continue to view concepts as primarily representational or skull-bound mental phenomena. As a result, the dynamics of action and the possible impact of material culture on conceptual thinking are poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the process and meaning of conceptual thinking from a material engagement perspective. We argue that conceptual thinking is not a matter of forming representations in the head but something we do-a way of engaging with materiality. Conceptual thinking is conceptual thinging, namely a kind of unmediated practical knowledge that individuals put into play when they engage, in a general way, with and through the world. In this sense, we propose that conceptual thinking is instantiated in the dynamic coordination of bodily practices and artefacts in sociomaterial activities. To elucidate this perspective, we introduce seven principles defining conceptual thinking within an ecological-enactive framework of cognition.

Indexed as

conceptual thinkingecological-enactive cognitionmaterial culturematerial engagement theorythings

Identifiers

PMID39118997
PMCPMC11304374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.