ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024
Circulating tumour DNA analysis for early detection of lung cancer: a systematic review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Differential analysis of lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma based on serum tumor markers: diagnostic performance and clinical utility.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Clinical usefulness of polygenic risk scores in risk prediction models for lung cancer screening and lung nodule management.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Long-read sequencing for cancer liquid biopsy: advancing precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
- The emerging role of circulating tumor DNA in brain tumor research.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Smart nanoplatforms for early detection and immune modulation in lung cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Preface on Lung Cancer Management-The Next Decade.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been applied in cancer diagnostics including lung cancer. Specifically for the early detection purpose, various modalities of ctDNA analysis have demonstrated their potentials. Such analyses have showed diverse performance across different studies. Methods: We performed a systematic review of original studies published before 1 January 2023. Studies that evaluated ctDNA alone and in combination with other biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer were included. Results: The systematic review analysis included 56 original studies that were aimed for early detection of lung cancer. There were 39 studies for lung cancer only and 17 for pan-cancer early detection. Cancer and control cases included were heterogenous across studies. Different molecular features of ctDNA have been evaluated, including 7 studies on cell-free DNA concentration, 17 on mutation, 29 on methylation, 5 on hydroxymethylation and 8 on fragmentation patterns. Among these 56 studies, 17 have utilised different combinations of the above-mentioned ctDNA features and/or circulation protein markers. For all the modalities, lower sensitivities were reported for the detection of early-stage cancer. Conclusions: The systematic review suggested the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis for early detection of lung cancer, alone or in combination with other biomarkers. Future validation with standardised testing protocols would help integration into clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.