ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2024
Surgical Technique for Compartmental Resection of T4b Gingivobuccal Cancer.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of pathologically positive lymph node in clinico-radiologic T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Review
- The combined compartmental maxillary resection: technique codification and preliminary multicenter series analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of advanced gingivo-buccal complex cancers involving the masticatory space (T4b) is often managed by compartment resection. The oncological safety of the procedure is now clearly established. Based on the origin and epicenter of the tumor there are two classes of compartmental resection. Those tumors arising from the tuberosity of the maxilla and/or upper gingival sulcus region; the resection involves the tumor, posterior maxilla, and the ipsilateral infratemporal fossa. These tumors can be resected by mandibulotomy approach, preserving the mandible. This constitutes class-1 infratemporal fossa resection. The class-2 infratemporal fossa resection is applied for those tumors arising from the retromolar trigone and/or lower gingivo-buccal sulcus region. In this class, the mandible and often the overlying cheek skin needs to be sacrificed, in addition to the contents of the infratemporal fossa and the posterior maxilla. Both the classes of resections are carried out in an orderly fashion following well-defined steps. These sequential steps maximize the exposure of inaccessible structures, enables protection of critical structures as well as minimizes blood loss. This manuscript describes the surgical steps for the two classes of compartmental resection of the infratemporal fossa for advanced gingivo-buccal complex cancers involving the masticatory space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.