ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2024
Carcinoma Cuniculatum, a Rare Variant of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Presentation of Five Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Landscape of Oral Carcinoma Cuniculatum and its Histological Mimics.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Intraosseous Atypical Verrucopapillary Epithelial Proliferation with Verrucous Carcinoma Features Evolving from a Keratinizing Odontogenic Cyst: Report of an Uncommon Variant and Review of the Literature.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral carcinoma cuniculatum (CC) is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma. It exhibits a locally aggressive behaviour, and its histopathology poses a diagnostic challenge, as it can be mistaken for other conditions. We present five cases of oral CC treated at our institution and conduct a comprehensive review of the current literature. Case Series: Five patients (two women and three men) were treated in our institution with a final diagnosis of oral CC. Ages ranged from 9 to 85 years at the time of diagnosis. Four patients had mandibular involvement requiring mandibulectomy and reconstruction using an osseous free flap. The diagnosis of oral CC was straightforward in the most recent cases. However, for the first two cases, the diagnosis of oral CC was established after thorough discussions between the surgeons and the pathologist regarding the similarities with recent cases. Consequently, the pathological specimens had to be retrospectively re-evaluated to confirm these diagnoses. Conclusions: Oral CC is a locally aggressive tumour that can present a challenge for pathologists, often leading to misdiagnosis. According to the existing literature, surgical resection with clear margins is the preferred treatment approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.