Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118878›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024

Evaluating three-dimensional lung reconstructions for thoracoscopic lung resections using open-source software: a pilot study.

Iris E W G Laven, Vincent P S Oosterhoff, Aimée J P M Franssen, Lori M van Roozendaal, Karel W E Hulsewé, Yvonne L J Vissers, Erik R de Loos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06132607 (Evaluating Three-dimensional Lung Reconstructions for Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Using Open-source Software), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06132607 completednot on this map

Evaluating Three-dimensional Lung Reconstructions for Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Using Open-source Software

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorErik de LoosRan2022 to 2023Enrolled13ConditionsLung Cancer, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Lobectomy, Segmentectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iris E W G LavenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-5293
Vincent P S OosterhoffDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Aimée J P M FranssenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6399-1663
Lori M van RoozendaalDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-1679
Karel W E HulsewéDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-1895
Yvonne L J VissersDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2890-8390
Erik R de LoosDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-2658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) lung reconstructions can reduce intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, and operation duration. These 3D reconstructions are predominantly provided by commercial expensive products, hence we aimed to assess the usability and performance of preoperative 3D lung reconstructions created with open-source software. Methods: Patients were invited to participate in this prospective pilot study if they were planned for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy or segmentectomy between January and February 2023. Participants were excluded if a two-dimensional (2D) late-arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan contained motion artifacts, another surgical procedure was performed, or the surgery was canceled. After informed consent was obtained, 3D lung reconstructions were constructed using open-source 3D Slicer software. The system usability score (SUS) questionnaire assessed the usability of these reconstructions, whilst performance was evaluated based on anatomical validity compared to prior 2D CT assessment as well as operative findings. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Thirteen patients were included, of whom one underwent a segmentectomy. Eighty-three percent of the 3D lung reconstructions scored above average (SUS >68). Compared to 2D CT scans, 38% of lung nodule segmental locations were detected more accurately through 3D lung reconstructions. Furthermore, 3D lung reconstructions revealed anatomical variations in 62%, which were not recognized on 2D CT scans, and provided surgeons with insights that would change the procedure and/or transection planes in 62%. One 3D lung reconstruction failed to demonstrate an intraoperative recognized segmental pulmonary artery (A6) branch. Conclusions: Three-dimensional lung reconstructions created with open-source software were usable and effective for uniportal VATS anatomical resections. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT06132607.

Indexed as

lung canceropen-source softwarethree-dimensional reconstructionthree-dimensional simulationVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID39118878
PMCPMC11304144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.