ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Evaluating three-dimensional lung reconstructions for thoracoscopic lung resections using open-source software: a pilot study.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06132607 (Evaluating Three-dimensional Lung Reconstructions for Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Using Open-source Software), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Three-dimensional Lung Reconstructions for Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Using Open-source Software
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Utilizing 3D Slicer for pulmonary bronchovascular anatomy reconstruction: a practical workflow and case examples.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Impact of patient-specific three-dimensional reconstruction on surgical planning and perioperative outcomes in early-stage lung cancer: a randomised clinical trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- 3DCT reconstruction-does 3DCT improve anatomical lung resection?-a narrative review of the literature.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Advances in the Application of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Thoracic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Thoracic cancer · 2025Review
- Advancements in 3D lung models for minimally invasive lung cancer surgery: from static to real-time dynamic modeling.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) lung reconstructions can reduce intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, and operation duration. These 3D reconstructions are predominantly provided by commercial expensive products, hence we aimed to assess the usability and performance of preoperative 3D lung reconstructions created with open-source software. Methods: Patients were invited to participate in this prospective pilot study if they were planned for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy or segmentectomy between January and February 2023. Participants were excluded if a two-dimensional (2D) late-arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan contained motion artifacts, another surgical procedure was performed, or the surgery was canceled. After informed consent was obtained, 3D lung reconstructions were constructed using open-source 3D Slicer software. The system usability score (SUS) questionnaire assessed the usability of these reconstructions, whilst performance was evaluated based on anatomical validity compared to prior 2D CT assessment as well as operative findings. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Thirteen patients were included, of whom one underwent a segmentectomy. Eighty-three percent of the 3D lung reconstructions scored above average (SUS >68). Compared to 2D CT scans, 38% of lung nodule segmental locations were detected more accurately through 3D lung reconstructions. Furthermore, 3D lung reconstructions revealed anatomical variations in 62%, which were not recognized on 2D CT scans, and provided surgeons with insights that would change the procedure and/or transection planes in 62%. One 3D lung reconstruction failed to demonstrate an intraoperative recognized segmental pulmonary artery (A6) branch. Conclusions: Three-dimensional lung reconstructions created with open-source software were usable and effective for uniportal VATS anatomical resections. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT06132607.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.