Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118847›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024

Moral identity in relation to emotional well-being: a meta-analysis.

Marlon Goering, Carlos N Espinoza, Alecia Mercier, Emma K Eason, Charles W Johnson, Caroline G Richter

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marlon GoeringDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Carlos N EspinozaDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Alecia MercierDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Emma K EasonDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Charles W JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Caroline G RichterDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Funding

Network to Advance the Study of Mechanisms Underlying Mind-Body Interventions and Measurement of Emotional WellbeingU24AT011281 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI CHAFOULEAS, SANDRA M, HOEFT, FUMIKO · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT011281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analytic review surveyed previous empirical studies that examined links between moral identity and indicators of emotional well-being. Additionally, this meta-analysis examined cultural origin as a moderator, testing if links between moral identity and emotional well-being differ in collectivistic vs. individualistic countries. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted through ProQuest's 65 databases and PubMed. A random-effect meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 4.0 (CMA) software. Results: Drawing on 27 eligible studies, moral identity was associated with greater emotional well-being ( Discussion: The results of this meta-analysis indicate a robust empirical relationship between moral identity and emotional well-being that is present across various dimensions of emotional well-being and in both individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/94f8b/?view_only=6db54da0fa304c83993d0438ecb5c637.

Indexed as

collectivismemotional well-beingindividualismmeta-analysismoral identity

Identifiers

PMID39118847
PMCPMC11307125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.