ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Learning styles, approaches and academic performance of second and third-year medical students of a medical college of Kathmandu: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blended learning and student engagement: a case of undergraduate business students in Nepal.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Assessing individual learning styles of undergraduate medical students utilizing Kolb's learning style inventory.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The research is based on a questionnaire to study the different learning styles among medical students, and their approach to intellectual development. Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study conducted on 140 participants. Initially after the informed consent process, the second-year and third-year medical students were requested to respond to the questionnaire without consulting friends. Data were analyzed descriptively and comparison was made. Results: In this study, the students were mostly visual learners, followed by solo learners, audio learners, verbal learners, and social learners. The majority of the students in our study (84.56%) studied less than 4 h per day beyond normal lecture hours. Similarly, 45.71% of students studied continuously for 30-60 min. During break, 63.57% of students used social media, watched television, and videos, and listened to music. Most students (75%) preferred to study in a hostel room and only 12.85% used the library as their study place. The majority of the students (65.71%) of students slept between six to eight hours. The University's suggested medical textbooks and reference materials were consulted by 94.3% of the students. The 47.85% of students favored self-directed learning with 56.42% preferring to read and write to retain the learned materials. Self-prepared notes were commonly used by the majority of students (60.7%). Conclusions: This research evaluates the preferred learning preferences of medical students and their relationship to academic performance, which will improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning between teachers and medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.