ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Apixaban versus low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apixaban Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Emerging Insights of Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment regimen for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) remains unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of (VKAs) versus direct apixaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CA-VTE. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy and safety of apixaban and LMWH in patients with CA-VTE. Major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and bleeding-related mortality were among outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results: The analysis included 12 011 patients from 3 RCTs and 2 observational studies. Compared to LMWH, apixaban significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.54, 0.83); Conclusion: Due to its lower risk of severe bleeding and reduced PE recurrence, apixaban may be a preferable treatment option for CA-VTE, but additional research is required to validate these conclusions and evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.