ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Teicoplanin in peritoneal dialysis: efficacy, safety, and pharmacological considerations.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a vital treatment modality for renal failure patients, facilitating the removal of excess fluid and unwanted substances. However, peritonitis, a significant complication experienced by PD patients, necessitates careful selection of antibiotics to ensure successful treatment. Commonly used antibiotics in PD patients, such as cephalosporins and glycopeptides like vancomycin, have been associated with undesirable side effects and high failure rates. In response to these challenges, teicoplanin, a novel glycopeptide antibiotic, has gained attention due to its similar range of activity to vancomycin, extended half-life, reduced side effects, and improved elimination. The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the efficacy, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and pharmacological benefits of teicoplanin in peritoneal dialysis patients. Our research involved an extensive review of 21 articles from reputable databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The data extracted from these studies was meticulously evaluated to comprehensively understand teicoplanin's clinical profile in this specific patient population. Major findings of these studies are that glycopeptide-based regimens have higher cure rates over first-generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones, and teicoplanin demonstrated several advantages over vancomycin, such as a higher therapeutic index, good tolerance, longer half-life, lower rates of nephrotoxicity, improved elimination while being equally effective. Teicoplanin is typically administered to peritoneal dialysis patients with a loading dose of 400 mg, aiming to achieve a trough concentration of 10-15 mg/dl. Teicoplanin's improved tolerability and lack of regular serum level monitoring requirements make it a promising alternative to traditional antibiotics for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.