Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118659›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2024

Responding to Key Process Markers as a Focus of Psychotherapy Training and Practice.

James F Boswell, Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Ashleigh E Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James F BoswellDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-0787
Michael J ConstantinoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-2575
Averi N GainesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-7059
Ashleigh E SmithDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-5837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, evidence-based psychotherapy training has favored the standardized application of discrete treatment packages, with key outcomes being the therapist's adherence to and competent delivery of theory-prescribed ingredients. However, this model often fails to align with the priorities and values of clinicians, and research casts doubt on the notion that a therapist's faithful application of treatment protocols is a valid index of clinical expertise. Considering this, training and practice models that emphasize evidence-based clinician flexibility and patient-centered tailoring of interventions are receiving increased attention. In this article, we outline one such model informed by the context-responsive psychotherapy integration (CRPI) framework. Consistent with CRPI principles, we describe several "if this/then try that" marker-response sequences that could become a centerpiece of a more nuanced, clinically representative, and evidence-based psychotherapy training paradigm. Finally, we offer several recommendations for future work on CRPI.

Indexed as

context-responsive psychotherapy integrationevidence-based practicepsychotherapy trainingresponsivenesstherapist development

Identifiers

PMID39118659
PMCPMC11303932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.