Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118626›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Simultaneous reaction- and analytical model building using dynamic flow experiments to accelerate process development.

Peter Sagmeister, Lukas Melnizky, Jason D Williams, C Oliver Kappe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter SagmeisterInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, NAWI Graz Heinrichstrasse 28 8010 Graz Austria jason.williams@rcpe.at oliver.kappe@uni-graz.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-1775
Lukas MelnizkyInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, NAWI Graz Heinrichstrasse 28 8010 Graz Austria jason.williams@rcpe.at oliver.kappe@uni-graz.at.
Jason D WilliamsInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, NAWI Graz Heinrichstrasse 28 8010 Graz Austria jason.williams@rcpe.at oliver.kappe@uni-graz.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-5094
C Oliver KappeInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, NAWI Graz Heinrichstrasse 28 8010 Graz Austria jason.williams@rcpe.at oliver.kappe@uni-graz.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-6007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern pharmaceutical research, the demand for expeditious development of synthetic routes to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) has led to a paradigm shift towards data-rich process development. Conventional methodologies encompass prolonged timelines for the development of both a reaction model and analytical models. The development of both methods are often separated into different departments and can require an iterative optimization process. Addressing this issue, we introduce an innovative dual modeling approach, combining the development of a Process Analytical Technology (PAT) strategy with reaction optimization. This integrated approach is exemplified in diverse amidation reactions and the synthesis of the API benznidazole. The platform, characterized by a high degree of automation and minimal operator involvement, achieves PAT calibration through a "standard addition" approach. Dynamic experiments are executed to screen a broad process space and gather data for fitting kinetic parameters. Employing an open-source software program facilitates rapid kinetic parameter fitting and additional

Identifiers

PMID39118626
PMCPMC11304546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.