ArticleCancer medicine2024
A multivariate retrospective analysis of high-grade gliomas: Survival and prognostic factors.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive analysis of clinical, pathological, and molecular risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with glioma.Medicine · 2025Observational
- The value of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype with telomerase reverse tranase (TERT) promoter mutation in glioma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Nomogram prediction of molecular characteristics in WHO grade 3-4 diffuse gliomas based on fractal analysis and VASARI features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Preliminary investigation on predicting postoperative glioma recurrences based on a multiparametric radiomics model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A multivariate retrospective analysis of high-grade gliomas: Survival and prognostic factors.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHigh-grade gliomas (HGGs) are highly malignant, aggressive, and have a high incidence and mortality rate. The aim of this study was to investigate survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with HGGs.
methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients with histologically confirmed HGGs were included. The recruitment period was from January 2011 to December 2019. We evaluated patient demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment methods, immunocytochemistry results, overall survival (OS) time, and progression-free survival (PFS) time using Kaplan-<>Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing. Additionally, we employed Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with survival outcomes.
resultsKaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 1-, 2-, and 5-years OS rates were 81.8%, 50.3%, and 12.6%, respectively. Similarly, the 1-, 2-, and 5-years PFS rates were 50.9%, 22.4%, and 3.1%, respectively. The median OS duration was 35.0 months. The univariate analysis indicated that postoperative pathological classification, grade, and age were significantly associated with patient outcomes (p < 0.01). Among the patients, 147 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 12 did not. The immunohistochemical markers of ki-67, MGMT, IDH1R132H, and p53 demonstrated statistically significant differences in their prognostic impact (p = 0.001, p = 0.020, p = 0.003, and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, we found that grades, age, pathological classification, ki-67, MGMT, and IDH1R132H expression were statistically significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.01, p = 0.004, p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.036, and p = 0.028). Additionally, immunohistochemical expressions of TRIB3 and AURKA were significantly higher in patients with shorter survival (p = 0.015 and p = 0.023).
conclusionsTumor grade and the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after surgery were independent prognostic factors that significantly influenced patient survival. Additionally, tumor grade and MGMT expression were found to be independent factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, the expression of TRIB3 and AURKA was higher in patients with poor survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.