Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118294›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2024

Acceptability, usability, and willingness to pay for HIV self-test kits distributed through community-based, PLHIV network-led and private practitioners models in India: Results from the STAR III Initiative.

Chinmay Laxmeshwar, Asha Hegde, Alpana Dange, Kannan Mariyappan, Manish Soosai, Sandeep Mane, Murugesan Sivasubramanian, Mahesh Doddamane, Madhuri Mukherjee, G S Shreenivas and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Chinmay LaxmeshwarPATH, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-3857
Asha HegdePATH, Mumbai, India.
Alpana DangeThe Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India.
Kannan MariyappanPATH, Mumbai, India.
Manish SoosaiSolidarity and Action Against The HIV Infection in India (SAATHII), Chennai, India.
Sandeep ManeThe Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India.
Murugesan SivasubramanianThe Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India.
Mahesh DoddamaneSolidarity and Action Against The HIV Infection in India (SAATHII), Chennai, India.
Madhuri MukherjeeInternational Training and Education Centre for Health (I-TECH), New Delhi, India.
G S ShreenivasPATH, Mumbai, India.
Manoj PardesiNational Coalition of People Living with HIV in India (NCPI+), New Delhi, India.
Vinod JambhaleNetwork of Maharashtra By People Living With HIV/AIDS (NMP+), Pune, India.
Venkateswara Rao PakkelaVoluntary Health Services (VHS), Chennai, India.
Vijayaraman ArumugamVoluntary Health Services (VHS), Chennai, India.
Vedant RungtaWilliam J. Clinton Foundation, New Delhi, India.
Yashika BansalWilliam J. Clinton Foundation, New Delhi, India.
Jatin ChaudaryThe Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India.
Vijay YeldandiSociety for Health Allied Research & Education India (SHARE India), Hyderabad, India.
Mahalingam PeriasamySociety for Health Allied Research & Education India (SHARE India), Hyderabad, India.
Chengappa UthappaDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), New Delhi, India.
Sudhir ChawlaDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), New Delhi, India.
Sunita UpadhyayaDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), New Delhi, India.
Melissa NyendakDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), New Delhi, India.
Venkatesan ChakrapaniCentre for Sexuality and Health Research and Policy (C-SHaRP), Chennai, India.
Sheela GodboleIndian Council of Medical Research, National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR-NARI), Pune, India.
Vinita VermaNational AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Bhawani Singh KushwahaNational AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Chinmoyee DasNational AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Shobini RajanNational AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Anoop Kumar PuriNational AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
J V R Prasada RaoFormer Health Secretary, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Tarun BhatnagarIndian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE), Chennai, India.
D C S ReddyIndependent Consultant, Lucknow, India.
Kimberly GreenPATH, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV self-testing (HIVST) has been shown to increase the uptake of HIV testing and help achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. This study assessed the acceptability, usability (ease of use and result interpretation) and the willingness to pay for HIVST kits distributed through three distribution models, namely the community-based, PLHIV network-led and private practitioners models, in India.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was implemented across 14 states in India between September 2021 and June 2022. All participants could choose between blood-based or oral-fluid-based test kits. Participants were shown a test-kit usage demonstration video, and pre- and post-test counselling was provided for all. Participants were followed-up after testing, and if reported reactive, were further supported for linkage to confirmatory testing and antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation.

resultsAmong the 90,605 participants found eligible, 88,080 (97%) accepted an HIVST kit. Among the 87,976 who reported using an HIVST kit, 45,207 (51%) preferred a blood-based kit, and 42,120 (48%) reported testing for the first time. For future testing, 77,064 (88%) reported preferring HIVST over other HIV testing methods. Among those who used the kit, 83,308 (95%) found the kit easy to use, and 83,237 (95%) reported that the test results were easy to interpret. Among those who preferred HIVST for future use, 52,136 (69%) were willing to pay for the kit, with 35,854 (69%) of those willing to pay less than US$ 1.20. Only one instance of social harm was reported, with a participant reporting suicidal tendencies due to discord with their partner. Out of 328 participants (0.4%) who tested reactive with HIVST, 291 (89%) were linked to confirmatory testing; of these, 254 were confirmed HIV positive, and 216 (85%) successfully initiated ART.

conclusionsOverall, we report that nearly all participants were willing to accept HIVST, found the test kits easy to use and interpret, and about two-thirds were willing to pay for HIVST. Given the high levels of acceptance and the ability to reach a large proportion of first-time testers, HIVST in India could contribute to achieving the UNAIDS first 95 and ending the HIV epidemic.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHIV TestingPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf-TestingAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticYoung AdultReagent Kits, DiagnosticHIV/AIDSHIV self‐testingHIV testingIndiakey populationoperational research

Identifiers

PMID39118294
PMCPMC11310287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.