Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118122›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

A risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithm for parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.

Tian Dai, Manzhen Bao, Miao Zhang, Zonggui Wang, JingJing Tang, Zeyan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tian DaiDepartment of General Surgery (Ward one), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0223-6829
Manzhen BaoNursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Miao ZhangNursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Zonggui WangDepartment of Orthopedics (Ward two), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
JingJing TangDepartment of General Surgery (Ward one), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Zeyan LiuDepartment of Emergency Internal Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China. jy02893741@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8807-368X

Funding

2020 Anhui Medical University Scientific Research Fund Youth Project 2020xkj1362021 Anhui Nursing Society Scientific Research Program Youth Project AHHL a202116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for postoperative parastomal hernia (PSH) in colorectal cancer patients undergoing permanent colostomy, assisting nurses in identifying high-risk groups and devising preventive care strategies.

methodsA case-control study was conducted on 495 colorectal cancer patients who underwent permanent colostomy at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2017 to June 2023, with a 1-year follow-up period. Patients were categorized into PSH and non-PSH groups based on PSH occurrence within 1-year post-operation. Data were split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Variable selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and binary classification prediction models were established using Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Classification (SVC), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XgBoost). The binary classification label denoted 1 for PSH occurrence and 0 for no PSH occurrence. Parameters were optimized via 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using Area Under Curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA), model explanation was enhanced using shapley additive explanation (SHAP), and model visualization was achieved using a nomogram.

resultsThe incidence of PSH within 1 year was 29.1% (144 patients). Among the models tested, the RF model demonstrated the highest discrimination capability with an AUC of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.881-0.935), along with superior specificity, accuracy, sensitivity, and F1 score. It also showed the highest clinical net benefit on the DCA curve. SHAP analysis identified the top 10 influential variables associated with PSH risk: body mass index (BMI), operation duration, history and status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), prealbumin, tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, stoma site, thickness of rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM), C-reactive protein CRP, american society of anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA), and stoma diameter. These insights from SHAP plots illustrated how these factors influence individual PSH outcomes. The nomogram was used for model visualization.

conclusionThe Random Forest model demonstrated robust predictive performance and clinical relevance in forecasting colonic PSH. This model aids in early identification of high-risk patients and guides preventive care.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColostomyMachine LearningAgedAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentMachine learningParastomal herniaPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID39118122
PMCPMC11308496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.