ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Deep learning-based multimodal fusion of the surface ECG and clinical features in prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Studies on obesity-related atrial fibrillation in the past 20 years: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating a digital decision aid for atrial fibrillation rhythm control in a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Can atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes be properly predicted with electrocardiography and artificial intelligence?European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Integration of EHR and ECG Data for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting the Substrate: Mechanism-Based Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Surgical Methods and Devices for Atrial Fibrillation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A knowledge embedded multimodal pseudo-siamese model for atrial fibrillation detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite improvement in treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), a significant proportion of patients still experience recurrence after ablation. This study aims to propose a novel algorithm based on Transformer using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and clinical features can predict AF recurrence.
methodsBetween October 2018 to December 2021, patients who underwent index radiofrequency ablation for AF with at least one standard 10-second surface ECG during sinus rhythm were enrolled. An end-to-end deep learning framework based on Transformer and a fusion module was used to predict AF recurrence using ECG and clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F1-score.
resultsA total of 920 patients (median age 61 [IQR 14] years, 66.3% male) were included. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 253 patients (27.5%) experienced AF recurrence. A single deep learning enabled ECG signals identified AF recurrence with an AUROC of 0.769, sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.1%, F1 score of 55.6% and overall accuracy of 65.2%. Combining ECG signals and clinical features increased the AUROC to 0.899, sensitivity to 81.1%, specificity to 81.7%, F1 score to 71.7%, and overall accuracy to 81.5%.
conclusionsThe Transformer algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in predicting AF recurrence. Integrating ECG and clinical features enhanced the models' performance and may help identify patients at low risk for AF recurrence after index ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.