Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118102›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2024

Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region.

Catherine El Ashkar, Rima Nakkash, Amal Matar, Jihad Makhoul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine El AshkarDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Rima NakkashGlobal and Community Health Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Amal MatarClinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jihad MakhoulDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. jm04@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

International Development Research Centre 103899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch cites shortcomings and challenges facing research ethics committees in many regions across the world including Arab countries. This paper presents findings from qualitative in-depth interviews with research ethics committee (REC) chairs to explore their views on the challenges they face in their work with the oversight of research involving human populations.

methodsVirtual in-depth interviews were conducted with chairs (n = 11) from both biomedical and/or social-behavioral research ethics committees in six countries, transcribed, coded and subject to thematic analysis for recurring themes.

resultsTwo sets of recurring themes impede the work of the committees and pose concerns for the quality of the research applications: (1) procedures and committee level challenges such as heavy workload, variations in member qualification, impeding bureaucratic procedures, member overwork, and intersecting socio-cultural values in the review process; (2) inconsistencies in the researchers' competence in both applied research ethics and research methodology as revealed by their applications.

conclusionsNarratives of REC chairs are important to shed light on experiences and issues that are not captured in surveys, adding to the body of knowledge with implications for the region, and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in other parts of the world. International research collaborations could benefit from the findings.

Indexed as

Ethics Committees, ResearchEthics, ResearchQualitative ResearchAfrica, NorthernBiomedical ResearchHumansMiddle EastResearch DesignResearch PersonnelWorkloadChallengesMiddle East North AfricaQualitative researchResearch ethicsResearch ethics committees

Identifiers

PMID39118102
PMCPMC11308332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.