Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39118095›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Antral membrane balloon technique versus Densah bur in crestal sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement: a randomized clinical trial.

Mohamed Mahmoud Alajami, Heba Abo-Elfetouh Elsheikh, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-Farag, Noha Ahmed Mansour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05922592 (Balloon Technique Versus Densah Bur in Crestal Sinus Lift Operation With Simultaneous Implant Placement. A Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922592 nacompletednot on this map

Balloon Technique Versus Densah Bur in Crestal Sinus Lift Operation With Simultaneous Implant Placement. A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled16ConditionsCrestal Sinus LiftArmscrestal sinus lift using ballon technique, crestal sinus lift using densah burs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed Mahmoud AlajamiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Heba Abo-Elfetouh ElsheikhDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. heba_elsheikh@mans.edu.eg.
Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-FaragDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Noha Ahmed MansourDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe posterior maxilla presents challenges for implant insertion because of the poor bone quality as well as the loss of vertical bone height. Indirect transcrestal sinus lift techniques are advised when a few millimeters of additional height are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of antral membrane balloon technique versus Densah burs for transcrestal maxillary sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted on 22 patients received 32 dental implants for replacement of missed maxillary posterior teeth after crestal maxillary sinus lifting. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1, patients underwent crestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement using antral membrane balloon technique. Group 2, patients underwent crestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement using Densah burs. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at regular time intervals immediately, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. All clinical and radiographic parameters were statistically analyzed.

resultsAll dental implants were successful for 12 months of follow up. Regarding implant primary stability, there was a statistical significant difference between the study groups in favor of Densah group (P = 0.004), while there was no significant difference after 6 months (P = 0.07). Radiographically, balloon group showed a statistically significant immediate postoperative vertical bone height (P < 0.0001), and significant reduction in vertical bone height after 6 months (P < 0.0001). Densah group showed significant increase in bone density (P ≤ 0.05).

conclusionBoth techniques demonstrated successful clinical and radiographic outcomes for crestal sinus lift. The antral membrane balloon group demonstrated better immediate postoperative vertical bone gain, while Densah burs had higher implant primary stability and bone density.

trial registrationThis study was registered in Clinical-Trials.gov PRS ( https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) under identification number NCT05922592 on 28/06/2023.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographySinus Floor AugmentationAdultDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMaxillaMaxillary SinusMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeDental ImplantsAllograftAntral membrane balloon elevationCrestal sinus liftDensah BurPosterior maxillaSimultaneous Implant Placement

Identifiers

PMID39118095
PMCPMC11312692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.