ArticleNeurocritical care2025
Assessing the Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination Process in Korea: Insights from 10-Year Noncompleted Donation Data.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the current status of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination in Korea over a decade, identifying key areas for improvement in the process.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the Korea Organ Donation Agency spanning 2011 to 2021, focusing on donors whose donations were not completed. The study reviewed demographics, medical settings, diagnoses, and outcomes, with particular emphasis on cases classified as nonbrain death and those resulting in death by cardiac arrest during the BD/DNC assessment.
resultsOf the 5047 patients evaluated for potential brain death from 2011 to 2021, 361 were identified as noncompleted donors. The primary reasons for noncompletion included nonbrain death (n = 68, 18.8%), cardiac arrests during the BD/DNC assessment process (n = 80, 22.2%), organ ineligibility (n = 151, 41.8%), and logistical and legal challenges (n = 62, 17.2%). Notably, 25 (36.8%) of them failed to meet the minimum clinical criteria, and 7 of them were potential cases of disagreement between the two clinical examinations. Additionally, most cardiac arrests (n = 44, 55.0%) occurred between the first and second examinations, indicating management challenges in critically ill patients during the assessment period.
conclusionsOur study highlights significant challenges in the BD/DNC determination process, including the need for improved consistency in neurologic examinations and the management of critically ill patients. The study underscores the importance of refining protocols and training to enhance the accuracy and reliability of brain death assessments, while also ensuring streamlined and effective organ donation practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39117963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.