Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117957›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.

Misha Armstrong, Pamela Lu, Jane Wang, Kevin El-Hayek, Sean Cleary, Horacio Asbun, Adnan Alseidi, Hop S Tran Cao, Alice C Wei, SAGES HPB Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Misha ArmstrongDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Pamela LuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jane WangDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kevin El-HayekDepartment of Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sean ClearyDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Horacio AsbunDepartment of Surgery, Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Hop S Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alice C WeiDepartment of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, C-886A, New York, NY, 10065, USA. alice.c.wei@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2505-959X
SAGES HPB Committee

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Emory Clinical Oncology Career Development Award K12 ProgramK12CA237806 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DHODAPKAR, KAVITA MADHAV, RAMALINGAM, SURESH S · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCI NIH HHS K12 CA237806NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption.

methodsA modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results.

resultsTwenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training.

conclusionsThis study reports surgeons' perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresAccessEquityHepatopancreatobiliaryRoboticsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39117957
PMCPMC11980437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.