Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117912›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Morphology analysis of PEEK 450G using scanning electron microscopy directly on fast scanning calorimetry chips.

Cleiton André Comelli, Nan Yi, HenkJan van der Pol, Oana Ghita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cleiton André ComelliFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, Streatham Campus, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK. c.a.comelli@exeter.ac.uk.
Nan YiFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, Streatham Campus, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK.
HenkJan van der PolBOND 3D, Institutenweg 50, 7521 PK, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Oana GhitaFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, Streatham Campus, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the morphology of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), this study employed fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The objective was to observe the PEEK microstructure under various thermal profiles replicating the additive manufacturing material extrusion process. Samples were observed using SEM directly from the FSC chips, allowing high-accuracy evaluation of the microstructure relative to the thermal profiles. This approach allowed for the evaluation of the microstructure with high accuracy concerning the thermal profiles to which the samples were previously exposed. Each sample was coated with a 10 nm layer of gold-palladium (20-80% ratio), and no etching was necessary to observe the micro features of the microstructure. The approach enabled successful observation and quantification of PEEK microstructure, linking substrate temperature and temperature peaks to microstructural outcomes. Notably, temperature peaks during the process enhanced the formation of well-developed, thick lamellae due to increased chain mobility. Additionally, embryos formed post-remelting of the substrate structure were observed.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingCrystallisationFSCPEEK

Identifiers

PMID39117912
PMCPMC11310210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.