ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024
Interpreting urinary iodine concentration: effects of urine dilution and collection timing.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timed saliva sampling as a new reliable marker for assessing iodine intake.Radiology and oncology · 2026Article
- Urinary Iodine and Maternal Thyroid Hormones Across Pregnancy Trimesters: a Stratified and Nonlinear Analysis from 2020-2024.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Dietary iodine and selenium exposure and thyroid function in adults: a total diet study with biomarker assessment.Nutrition research and practice · 2026Article
- Iodine deficiency among thyroid conference participants in Austria.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Article
- The predictive value of the urinary iodine-to-creatine ratio in spot samples for the estimation of 24-hour urinary iodine excretion in adult non-pregnant women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
- Urinary iodine concentration and thyroid function in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn population studies, iodine intake estimation relies on median urinary iodine concentration (UIC). However, interpreting UIC measurements can be challenging.
methodsIn our study, we included 772 adult participants from three groups: nationally representative gender-mixed, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. We measured UIC and urinary creatinine (U-Cr) to calculate the iodine-to-creatinine ratio (I/Cr). U-Cr cut-off value of 0.226 g/L was used for differentiation between diluted and undiluted urine samples. After excluding samples below this cut-off, new median UIC and I/Cr ratios were calculated. We additionally evaluated the influence of urine sample collection time on UIC.
resultsMedian UICs were 91.8 µg/L for nationally representative group, 58.3 µg/L for women of reproductive age, and 74.9 µg/L for pregnant women, while I/Cr ratios were 91.7, 102.0, and 159.2 µg/g, respectively. After implementing U-Cr cut-off and excluding all data where U-Cr was below cut-off, new median values were 93.4, 76.3, and 95.4 µg/L for UICs, and 88.6, 88.8, and 128.7 µg/g for I/Cr ratios, respectively. In women of reproductive age, median UIC was significantly lower in urine samples collected after 9:30 and after 12:00 as compared to samples collected before 9.30 (53.4, 57.8, and 97.3 μg/L, respectively).
conclusionsUIC results should be interpreted with caution, considering urine dilution and sample collection timing. U-Cr measurement should be included in population-based iodine intake studies, with corrections applied especially for pregnant women and younger adults, for whom morning is best for single-spot samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.