Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117906›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024

Interpreting urinary iodine concentration: effects of urine dilution and collection timing.

Adrijana Oblak, Maša Hribar, Hristo Hristov, Matej Gregorič, Urška Blaznik, Joško Osredkar, Anita Kušar, Katja Žmitek, Živa Lavriša, Tjaša Zaletel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Adrijana OblakDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maša HribarNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Hristo HristovNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matej GregoričNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urška BlaznikNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Joško OsredkarClinical Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anita KušarNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja ŽmitekNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Živa LavrišaNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tjaša ZaletelSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Blaž KrhinDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Igor PravstNutrition Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-1778
Simona GaberščekDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja ZaletelDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. katja.zaletel@kclj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8823-3489

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 634435EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 634453The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) L3-8213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn population studies, iodine intake estimation relies on median urinary iodine concentration (UIC). However, interpreting UIC measurements can be challenging.

methodsIn our study, we included 772 adult participants from three groups: nationally representative gender-mixed, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. We measured UIC and urinary creatinine (U-Cr) to calculate the iodine-to-creatinine ratio (I/Cr). U-Cr cut-off value of 0.226 g/L was used for differentiation between diluted and undiluted urine samples. After excluding samples below this cut-off, new median UIC and I/Cr ratios were calculated. We additionally evaluated the influence of urine sample collection time on UIC.

resultsMedian UICs were 91.8 µg/L for nationally representative group, 58.3 µg/L for women of reproductive age, and 74.9 µg/L for pregnant women, while I/Cr ratios were 91.7, 102.0, and 159.2 µg/g, respectively. After implementing U-Cr cut-off and excluding all data where U-Cr was below cut-off, new median values were 93.4, 76.3, and 95.4 µg/L for UICs, and 88.6, 88.8, and 128.7 µg/g for I/Cr ratios, respectively. In women of reproductive age, median UIC was significantly lower in urine samples collected after 9:30 and after 12:00 as compared to samples collected before 9.30 (53.4, 57.8, and 97.3 μg/L, respectively).

conclusionsUIC results should be interpreted with caution, considering urine dilution and sample collection timing. U-Cr measurement should be included in population-based iodine intake studies, with corrections applied especially for pregnant women and younger adults, for whom morning is best for single-spot samples.

Indexed as

CreatinineIodineUrine Specimen CollectionAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyTime FactorsYoung AdultCreatinineIodine

Identifiers

PMID39117906
PMCPMC11611732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.