Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117866›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2024

PTBP1-mediated repression of neuron-specific CDC42 splicing constitutes a genomic alteration-independent, developmentally conserved vulnerability in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Junjie Yang, Jing Feng, Jing Lv, Xiaojing Chu, Yanfei Wei, Yunqiu Zhang, Jiuyi Li, Yingyu Sun, Guanzhang Li, Tao Jiang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Junjie YangDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jing FengDepartment of Pathology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100093, China.
Jing LvDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xiaojing ChuDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yanfei WeiDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yunqiu ZhangCenter of Growth Metabolism & Aging, Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Jiuyi LiCollege of Life Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610101, China.
Yingyu SunDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Guanzhang LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing, 100070, China.
Tao JiangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing, 100070, China.
Jinyan HuangBiomedical Big Data Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolong FanDepartment of Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Gene Resource and Molecular Development, and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences , Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. xfan@bnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene co-expression networks may encode hitherto inadequately recognized vulnerabilities for adult gliomas. By identifying evolutionally conserved gene co-expression modules around EGFR (EM) or PDGFRA (PM), we recently proposed an EM/PM classification scheme, which assigns IDH-wildtype glioblastomas (GBM) into the EM subtype committed in neural stem cell compartment, IDH-mutant astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas into the PM subtype committed in early oligodendrocyte lineage. Here, we report the identification of EM/PM subtype-specific gene co-expression networks and the characterization of hub gene polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) as a genomic alteration-independent vulnerability in IDH-wildtype GBM. Supervised by the EM/PM classification scheme, we applied weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify subtype-specific global gene co-expression modules. These gene co-expression modules were characterized for their clinical relevance, cellular origin and conserved expression pattern during brain development. Using lentiviral vector-mediated constitutive or inducible knockdown, we characterized the effects of PTBP1 on the survival of IDH-wildtype GBM cells, which was complemented with the analysis of PTBP1-depedent splicing pattern and overexpression of splicing target neuron-specific CDC42 (CDC42-N) isoform.  Transcriptomes of adult gliomas can be robustly assigned into 4 large gene co-expression modules that are prognostically relevant and are derived from either malignant cells of the EM/PM subtypes or tumor microenvironment. The EM subtype is associated with a malignant cell-intrinsic gene module involved in pre-mRNA splicing, DNA replication and damage response, and chromosome segregation, and a microenvironment-derived gene module predominantly involved in extracellular matrix organization and infiltrating immune cells. The PM subtype is associated with two malignant cell-intrinsic gene modules predominantly involved in transcriptional regulation and mRNA translation, respectively. Expression levels of these gene modules are independent prognostic factors and malignant cell-intrinsic gene modules are conserved during brain development. Focusing on the EM subtype, we identified PTBP1 as the most significant hub for the malignant cell-intrinsic gene module. PTBP1 is not altered in most glioma genomes. PTBP1 represses the conserved splicing of CDC42-N. PTBP1 knockdown or CDC42-N overexpression disrupts actin cytoskeleton dynamics, causing accumulation of reactive oxygen species and cell apoptosis. PTBP1-mediated repression of CDC42-N splicing represents a potential genomic alteration-independent, developmentally conserved vulnerability in IDH-wildtype GBM.

Indexed as

cdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinGlioblastomaHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsPolypyrimidine Tract-Binding ProteinBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseNeuronsRNA Splicingcdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCDC42 protein, humanHeterogeneous-Nuclear RibonucleoproteinsIsocitrate DehydrogenasePolypyrimidine Tract-Binding ProteinPTBP1 protein, humanBrain developmentEM/PM classificationGliomaPTBP1Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.