Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117767›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Comparison of bioactive material failure rates in vital pulp treatment of permanent matured teeth - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Péter Komora, Orsolya Vámos, Noémi Gede, Péter Hegyi, Kata Kelemen, Adél Galvács, Gábor Varga, Beáta Kerémi, János Vág

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Management strategies for pulpitis in vital permanent teeth in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Melatonin and the Dental Pulp: A Scoping Review.International endodontic journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Péter KomoraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest Szentkiralyi Utca 47, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya VámosCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Noémi GedeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Kata KelemenCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Adél GalvácsDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest Szentkiralyi Utca 47, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor VargaCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Beáta KerémiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest Szentkiralyi Utca 47, Budapest, Hungary. keremi.beata@semmelweis.hu.
János VágDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest Szentkiralyi Utca 47, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is the gold standard for vital pulp treatment (VPT), but its superiority over novel calcium silicate-based cements in permanent teeth lacks systematic evidence. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these materials in VPT through a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until January 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving VPT with biomaterials and reversible or irreversible pulpitis diagnoses in mature permanent teeth. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of failure rates with 95% confidence intervals. In the 21 eligible trials, failure rates were significantly higher with calcium-hydroxide than MTA at six (OR 2.26 [1.52-3.36]), 12 (OR 2.53 [1.76-3.62]), and 24 months (OR 2.46 [1.60-3.79]). Failure rates for Totalfill at six (OR 1.19 [0.55-2.58]) and 12 months (OR 1.43 [0.71-2.92]), and Biodentine at six (OR 1.09 [0.66-1.78]), 12 (OR 1.21 [0.74-1.96]), and 24 months (OR 1.47 [0.81-2.68]) were not significantly different from MTA. The results were similar in the direct pulp capping subgroup, whereas, in the partial and full pulpotomy subgroup, there was not enough evidence to achieve significant differences. MTA, Biodentine, and Totalfill are the most efficient materials for VPT. However, calcium-hydroxide-based materials are not recommended in VPT.

Indexed as

Calcium CompoundsSilicatesAluminum CompoundsBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium HydroxideDental PulpDental Pulp CappingDentition, PermanentDrug CombinationsHumansOxidesPulpitisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAluminum CompoundsBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium CompoundsCalcium HydroxideDrug Combinationsmineral trioxide aggregateOxidesSilicatesBiocompatible materialsCalcium hydroxideMineral trioxide aggregateNetwork meta-analysisTricalcium silicate

Identifiers

PMID39117767
PMCPMC11310317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.