ArticleBone marrow transplantation2024
Safety and efficacy of G-CSF after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide: clinical and in vitro examination of endothelial activation.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defibrotide for Protecting Against and Managing Endothelial Injury in Hematologic Malignancies and COVID-19.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Article
- Testicular Sertoli Cell Membrane-Modified Schisandrin A-Loaded Catalase Nanoparticles Ameliorate Cytoxan-Induced Testicular Injury.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2021 the use of G-CSF was implemented in allo-HCT with PTCY-based prophylaxis with the aim of shortening the aplastic phase and reducing infectious complications. This study investigates the effectiveness of this change in protocol performed at our institution. One-hundred forty-six adults undergoing allo-HCT with PTCY-based prophylaxis were included, and among them, 58 (40%) received G-CSF. The median of days to neutrophil engraftment was shorter in the G-CSF group (15 vs. 20 days, p < 0.001). Patients receiving G-CSF had a lower incidence of day +30 bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI) than the rest (20.7% vs. 47.7%, p < 0.001). GVHD, SOS, and TA-TMA incidences were comparable between groups, and using G-CSF did not impact on survival. Endothelial activation was investigated using EASIX and by the measurement of soluble biomarkers in cryopreserved plasma samples obtained on days 0, +7, +14 and +21 of 39 consecutive patients (10 received G-CSF) included in the study. EASIX, VWF:Ag, sVCAM-1, sTNFRI, ST2, REG3α, TM and NETs medians values were comparable in patients receiving G-CSF and those who did not. Compared with allo-HCT performed without G-CSF, the addition of G-CSF to PTCY-based allo-HCT accelerated neutrophil engraftment contributing on decreasing BSI incidence, and without inducing additional endothelial activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39117736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.