ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Modelling HIV-1 control and remission.
Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AZD5582 robustly reactivates latently infected cells and clears the majority of those reactivated from the SIV reservoir.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mechanism for evolution of diverse autologous antibodies upon broadly neutralizing antibody therapy of people with HIV.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Mathematical modeling and mechanisms of HIV latency for personalized anti latency therapies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- A consensus mathematical model of vaccine-induced antibody dynamics for multiple vaccine platforms and pathogens.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Trade-off between the antiviral and vaccinal effects of antibody therapy in the humoral response to HIV.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Antiviral capacity of the early CD8 T-cell response is predictive of natural control of SIV infection: Learning in vivo dynamics using ex vivo data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remarkable advances are being made in developing interventions for eliciting long-term remission of HIV-1 infection. The success of these interventions will obviate the need for lifelong antiretroviral therapy, the current standard-of-care, and benefit the millions living today with HIV-1. Mathematical modelling has made significant contributions to these efforts. It has helped elucidate the possible mechanistic origins of natural and post-treatment control, deduced potential pathways of the loss of such control, quantified the effects of interventions, and developed frameworks for their rational optimization. Yet, several important questions remain, posing challenges to the translation of these promising interventions. Here, we survey the recent advances in the mathematical modelling of HIV-1 control and remission, highlight their contributions, and discuss potential avenues for future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.